Where Architects Dream #2: What is Luxury?
Six takes on spaces in which these creative minds who design homes and review architecture projects, dream. Part 2 of 6
Quality of life and the subjective concept of luxury was the next question we discussed with architects and architecture editors in Lisbon where reSITE and MAAT hosted RESONATE, on February 12, 2018. Having in mind #reSITE2018 core topic, housing, we tried to draw what could be a trend of today, or at least sneak into what type of environment shapes architects’ dreams. What are the housing and urban living preferences, practices and predictions of those who design homes and review architecture projects?
Read where and how these creative minds work and sleep: Kjetil Trædal Thorsen (Snøhetta, Oslo), Jessica Mairs (Dezeen, London), Michael Jones, (Foster + Partners, London), Birgit Lohmann (Deisgnboom, Milan and Sardinia), Louis Becker (Henning Larsen, Copenhagen) and the visual artist Xavier Veilhan (Paris).
Question: What would you say has the most impact on the quality of life? What makes a city a great place to live?
Don't Miss What's Coming Next:
- #3 Not For Me
- #4 So Close, Yet So Far
- #5 On The Move
- #6 Elon Musk
As I get to a certain point in my life, I think more and more that actually one place is not enough for anyone to live and that you need a blend of different places and a blend of different types of experience, qualities, and characteristics. I think common to all of them, would need to be being a bit cosmopolitan, liberal and open-minded. You can get that at different scales. People need to be tolerant. It needs to be open and inclusive wherever you live. Beyond that, there are many scales and densities at which that’s possible.
I think that at different points in your life, or your week, or even your day that you need different things. Sometimes you need to be immersed in bright, vibrant cultures, like we have in London or New York. I love being in New York. Or, there are other moments when you need solitude and peace. For me, the perfect place to live is where I can have extremes in every sense. I like London because it offers something for everyone: scales, densities, different perspectives.
I like when there’s expertise in many fields. They’re organized but not too organized. They’re open to changes. It could be many cities in Italy. I’m fascinated by the cities in the south. I am a resident of Sardinia, a small island with many cacti and not many neighbors. The south has economic problems and working is not as easy as in the north, but I would prefer the south.
I think it’s being able to get from where you work and where you live to where you want to spend your social time. I think particularly in a city like London, where that time can take up so much of your day, that tends to be the most important thing for me. Being able get to work and home but then also to get out and see friends and family and split your time gives you a good quality of life.
The people. I mean that’s a bit conventional, but I’m a family person. My children are a bit older now, but we are still living under the same roof, like five adults. I like very much being in the same living or working space with people but not talking. The ultimate reference situation to me is like being in a car when you are with your family or friends and you talk a lot but at some point you end up driving in silence, that is the situation I prefer.
Now the luxury plays in, I think it’s fantastic if you’re living in a city and you have a longer view than the next building. Two years ago, I bought an apartment at The Lakes in Copenhagen. I have a long [view] across water to the lakes on the other side, and in front of me I don’t have any roads. I just have people, like here, walking or running. You open the door and hear people running and walking and talking.
I think luxury is about coming from your apartment—it can be tiny—and you go to the street and something is happening that’s inclusive. You can sit in a square, have a coffee. People are walking. Things are happening. I rented an apartment two or three years ago, a huge apartment, 185 m2. It had cupboards and two bathrooms and everything you could think of. It was dead boring. It didn’t work. I think you can minimize your number of square meters if it’s in a meaningful context. If you don’t have a meaningful context, you have to add square meters.
Kjetil Trædal Thorsen
I think we are conscious about where we live in relation to others. There’s a huge dimension: social dynamics related to where you live combined with your emotional, physical relationships that you have with your surroundings. I think in the end there are primary things that you have to have solved: you’re not freezing; you’re not hungry. Once you’ve lifted yourself beyond that issue of being hungry and freezing, then you start interacting with others in a different way. That demands another development of social space.
Interested in the discussion surrounding the future of housing, living conditions and quality of life? Join the reSITE 2018 Event.
Socially conscious designers leverage economic, environmental, political and cultural factors and consider them in their efforts to improve the livability of the built environment.
Cities benefit tremendously from the incorporation of greenspace, a connection to nature that is an arena to cultivate community.
Technology is embedded in contemporary cities. From surveillance cameras to street lights, architects, scientists, planners, and engineers are finding new ways to streamline urban environments to improve the quality of life. Yet, some worry that increasing reliance on technology could lead to its potential abuse, especially when it comes to personal privacy.
Within the fields of architecture and urban planning, women are making their case for creating built environments that serve all genders. To close the gap of gender inequality and make spaces more inclusive and safe for women, the unique perspective provided by these speakers is essential to augmenting our idea of design. To move towards more inclusive cities, women must be at the forefront of change.
Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic for the New York Times, speaks to reSITE about how architects are responsible for creating healthy cities to address climate change, refugees, and urbanisation. In conversation with urban planners and designers, architects can create resilient neighborhoods and cities.
Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic for the New York Times, uses Stuttgart, Mexico City, and Guangzhou as examples of ways cities have handled an influx of migrants and how the cities have adapted or not adapted differently. The current issues in these cities differ based on location, situation of incoming migrants, and how well the city has handled new arrivals, with Stuttgart presented as a model city for migrant reception.
Saskia Sassen, professor of sociology at Columbia University, discusses the migrant experience relating to land use and the urban habitat. She focuses on the privatizing and corporatizing of modern cities and how these trends affect the people living in cities, especially disadvantaged and ignored populations.
Ekim Tan, inventor of Play the City, moderated and listened to participants discuss the experience of their city, including the urban issues they faced and solutions to problems. At reSITE 2016, attendees played a large scale "Play the City" game where they were assigned roles and simulated making decisions and reacting to events in a city.